Book Reviews Explained

There’s a method to this madness.

The Shooting Star, 5/5 5

  • Characters are well developed, deep, rich, and relatable.
  • Manuscript is written well and author’s writing style is fluid and effective.
  • Very minimal grammatical, content errors, syntax, or punctuation errors were found in the manuscript. When found, had little impact on content development.
  • Author demonstrates deep thought during manuscript development.
  • Story and author are extremely marketable.

The Trailing Star, 4/5 4

  • Characters are well developed, deep, rich, and relatable.
  • Manuscript is written well, author’s writing style is fluid and effective.
  • Some obvious minor grammatical, content errors, or punctuation errors were found in the manuscript.
  • Author demonstrate deep thought during manuscript development.
  • Story and author demonstrate potential for marketability.

The Basic Star, 3/5 3

  • Characters are well developed, deep, rich, original, and relatable.
  • Manuscript is written well.
  • Author’s writing style is fluid and effective.
  • Very obvious grammatical, content errors, or punctuation errors were found in the manuscript and impacted the flow of the book.
  • Author demonstrates deep thought during manuscript development.

The Meh Star, 2/5 2

  • Lack of character complexity or originality.
  • Manuscript needs heavy editing work.
  • Content and syntax were confusing.
  • There was no fluidity within the writing or author demonstrated a writing style that wasn’t creative or evolved.
  • There were a lot of grammatical errors in the manuscript.

The Mercy Star, 1/5 1

  • No character complexity, originality, or little to no character development.
  • Manuscript needs heavy editing work.
  • Most of the content and syntax was confusing.
  • There was no fluidity within the writing. The manuscript just didn’t work as a whole.
  • There were a lot of grammatical errors.
  • Manuscript demonstrates author had not intention of publishing a completed work or lack of professional development.
  • Manuscript is incomplete.

Rating system as of February 2017.

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: